Using a bicycle as pre-transport for public transport significantly changes travel patterns. Still journey planners are not able to cope with this combination of modalities. Moreover, one of the Netherlands largest journey planning apps "9292" stated that customers are not interested in journey plans with the option to use bicycle in their journey.
The Urban-Engine was used to draw insights on this matter and it was found that for the traveller it is impossible to take an informed decision on the way to travel as it is nearly impossible to evaluate all the different alternatives.
The analysis used to compare journey plans using public transport and journey plans with public transport where a bicycle is used as pre-transport. The city of Amsterdam is divided in regions of 100m by 100m and for each grid journey plans are requested towards Amersfoort station. This is done for every 15 minutes between 07:00 and 08:00 as departure time. It is assumed that the pre-transport on bicycle is a maximum of 20 minutes. The study shows that 41% of the journey plans would have a different departing railway station and the average time saving on the journey is 19%. The map indicates in orange which grid locations have changed their departing station.
We believe that using a personalized journey plan including bicycle as modality will improve the complete end-to-end journey of the traveler.
Want to read more about what the Urban-Engine does and can? Read our white paper here!
Read WhitepaperUrban-Engine is constructed of multiple features that individually can be used to highlight and strengthen analysis.
How far can you travel within a certain time period?
Reachability performance indicators on hectare level.
How many options can you take to your destination?
Evaluate current service plans and test future service plans.
Compare bike, bus, train and car or combine modalities to evaluate attractiveness for the traveler.
Want to know more about a specific topic? Please contact us and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible!